Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

DFARS PGI 225_70



(Revised December 4, 2018)

PGI 225.70—AUTHORIZATION ACTS, APPROPRIATIONS ACTS, AND OTHER STATUTORY RESTRICTIONS ON FOREIGN ACQUISITION

PGI 225.7002 Restrictions on food, clothing, fabrics, and hand or measuring tools.

PGI 225.7002-1 Restrictions.

Berry Amendment applicable to clothing does not preclude application of another Berry

Amendment restriction in DFARS 225.7002-1 to the components of the item.

to, and not normally associated with, clothing. Therefore, SAPI plates are not covered

under the Berry Amendment as clothing. However, fabrics used in the SAPI plate are still subject to the foreign source restrictions of the Berry Amendment. If the fabric used in the SAPI plate is a synthetic fabric or a coated synthetic fabric, the fibers and yarns used in the fabric are not covered by the Berry Amendment, because the fabric is a component of an end product that is not a textile product (see DFARS 225.7002-2(m).

that the hand or measuring tool was assembled in the United States out of components, or

otherwise made from raw materials into the finished product that is to be provided to the Government.

States, then disassembled and reassembled in the United States, the hand or measuring

tool was not produced in the United States.

does not impose any restriction on the source of the components of the hand or measuring

tools. This is unlike the Berry Amendment restriction on clothing (see 225.7002-1(a)(1)(ii)),

which explicitly requires domestic source for the materials and components of clothing (other than unusual components such as sensors or electronics), as well as the additional separate restrictions on various types of fibers and fabrics that might be components of the clothing.

American statute (see FAR subpart 25.1), then in order to qualify as a domestic end

product, the cost of the components mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or a qualifying country, must exceed 50 percent of the cost of all the components of the hand or measuring tool.

PGI 225.7002-2 Exceptions.

PGI 225.7003 Restrictions on acquisition of specialty metals.

PGI 225.7003-2 Restrictions.

PGI 225.7003-3 Exceptions.

HPM = High performance magnet

COTS = Commercially available off-the-shelf

Magnet made of specialty metal is:

Commercially available,

HPM

NOT

Commercially

available,

HPM

COTS,

NOT HPM

NOT COTS,

NOT HPM

Incorporated into

COTS assembly

or COTS end item

NOT

restricted

*

NOT

restricted

*

NOT incorporated into COTS assembly or COTS end item

Restricted

Restricted

NOT

restricted

Restricted

Included in 2 percent minimum content?

Cannot be included in 2 percent minimum content

Cannot be included in 2 percent minimum content

NOT

restricted

Can be included in 2 percent minimum content

* By definition, COTS assemblies and COTS end items will not include a HPM that is not commercially available or any other magnet that is not COTS.

PGI 225.7017 Utilization of domestic photovoltaic devices.

PGI 225.7017-4 Waiver.

The following templates are provided as examples, and may be modified as appropriate for a particular acquisition.

SAMPLE D&F:

SERVICE OR AGENCY

Waiver of Section 858 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015

Determination and Findings of Inconsistency with the Public interest

Upon the basis of the following findings and determination which I hereby make in accordance with the provisions of DFARS 225.7017-4(a)(1), U.S.-made photovoltaic devices may be utilized as follows:

Findings

1. The (contracting office) proposes to award a contract under contract number ________________ that provides for photovoltaic devices manufactured or substantially transformed in the United States to be—

2. The total estimated cost of these photovoltaic devices is $_____________.

3. Section 858 of the NDAA for FY 2015 requires that any photovoltaic device installed under a covered contract be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States (i.e., a domestic photovoltaic device), unless waived on a case-by case basis because the inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law.

4. Pursuant to the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 and the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement, the President has authority to waive, in whole or in part, with respect to eligible products of any foreign country or instrumentality designated under subsection (b) of this section, and suppliers of such products, the application of any law, regulation, procedure, or practice regarding Government procurement that would, if applied to such products and suppliers, result in treatment less favorable than that accorded to—

5. The solicitation contained the clause at DFARS 252.225-7017, Photovoltaic Devices, and the provision at DFARS 252.225-7018, Photovoltaic Devices—Certification. The offeror has certified that the photovoltaic devices to be utilized under this contract are U.S.-made photovoltaic devices. Offers were solicited from other sources and the offer received from (offeror) is found to be otherwise eligible for award.

Determination

I hereby determine that it is inconsistent with the public interest to apply the restrictions of section 858 of the NDAA for FY 2015 to the offer described in this determination and findings.

(Date)

SAMPLE D&F:

SERVICE OR AGENCY

Waiver of Section 858 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015

Determination and Findings of Inconsistency with the Public interest

Upon the basis of the following findings and determination which I hereby make in accordance with DFARS 225.7017-4(a)(2), a qualifying country photovoltaic device may be utilized as follows:

Findings

1. The (contracting office) proposes to award a contract under contract number ________________ that provides for photovoltaic devices manufactured in (qualifying country of origin) to be—

2. The total aggregate cost of these photovoltaic devices is $_____________.

3. Section 858 of the NDAA for FY 2015 requires that any photovoltaic device installed under a covered contract be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States (i.e., a domestic photovoltaic device), unless waived on a case-by-case basis because the inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law.

4. The United States Government and the Government of _____________ have signed a memorandum of understanding, in which the Governments have agreed that, in relation to defense procurement, each country will accord to the industries of the other country treatment no less favorable than that accorded to its own industries insofar as laws and regulations permit. The reciprocal opportunities that the memorandum of understanding affords to the Governments and their defense industries enhances our mutual military readiness and promotes standardization and interoperability of equipment between the armed forces of the two nations. These factors contribute considerably to the security of the United States.

5. The Agreement stipulates that utilization of such items shall fully satisfy Department of Defense requirements for performance, quality, and delivery and shall cost the Department of Defense no more than would comparable U.S. source or other foreign source defense equipment.

6. The solicitation contained the clause at DFARS 252.225-7017, Photovoltaic Devices, and the provision at DFARS 252.225-7018, Photovoltaic Devices—Certification. The offeror has certified that the photovoltaic devices to be utilized under this contract are qualifying country photovoltaic devices. Offers were solicited from other sources and the offer received from (offeror) is found to be otherwise eligible for award.

Determination

I hereby determine that it is inconsistent with the public interest to apply the restrictions of section 858 of the NDAA for FY 2015 to the offer described in this determination and findings.

(Date)

SAMPLE D&F:

SERVICE OR AGENCY

Waiver of Section 858 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015

Determination and Findings of Unreasonable Cost of Domestic Photovoltaic Devices

Upon the basis of the following findings and determination which I hereby make in accordance with the provisions of DFARS 225.7017-4(b), foreign photovoltaic devices may be utilized as follows:

Findings

1. The (contracting office) proposes to award a contract under contract number __________, that provides for photovoltaic devices manufactured in (country of origin) to be—

2. The total aggregate cost of these photovoltaic devices is $________________.

3. Section 858 of the NDAA for FY 2015 requires that any photovoltaic device installed under a covered contract be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States (i.e., a domestic photovoltaic device), unless waived on a case-by case basis because the inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law.

4. The solicitation contained the clause at DFARS 252.225-7017, Photovoltaic Devices, and the provision at DFARS 252.225-7018, Photovoltaic Devices—Certification. The offeror has provided documentation in accordance with the provision DFARS 252.225-7018 that the cost of a domestic photovoltaic device would be unreasonable in comparison to the cost of the proposed foreign photovoltaic device, i.e., that the price of the foreign photovoltaic device plus 50 percent is less than the price of a comparable domestic photovoltaic device.

Determination

I hereby determine that the cost of utilizing domestic photovoltaic devices would be unreasonable, and therefore waive application of the restrictions of section 858 of the NDAA for FY 2015 to the offer described in this determination and findings.

(Date)

Previous PageTop Of PageTable Of ContentsNext Page