PART 2415--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
PART 2415--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
Sec.
Subpart 2415. 2--Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information
2415.204 Contract format.
2415.209 Solicitation provisions.
Subpart 2415.3--Source Selection
2415.303 Responsibilities.
2415.304 Evaluation factors and subfactors.
2415.305 Proposal evaluation.
2415.308 Source selection decision.
Subpart 2415.5--Preaward, Award, and Postaward Notifications, Protests, and Mistakes
2415.507 Protests against award.
Subpart 2415.6--Unsolicited Proposals
2415.605 Content of unsolicited proposals.
2415.605-70 Unsolicited research proposals.
2415.606 Agency procedures.
Subpart 2415.2 --Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Quotations
(e) The cognizant HCA shall be responsible for making exemptions pursuant to FAR 15.204(e).
2415.209 Solicitation provisions.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at 2452.215-70, Proposal Content, in all solicitations for negotiated procurements using the tradeoff selection process expected to exceed the simplified acquisition limit. The Contracting officer shall adapt paragraph (c) of the provision (i.e., include, delete or further supplement subparagraphs) to address the particular requirements of the immediate solicitation. The provision may be used in simplified acquisitions when it is necessary to obtain technical and management information in making the award selection. When award selection will be made through the lowest-priced technically acceptable proposal method, the provision shall be used with its Alternate I. If the proposed contract requires work on, or access to, sensitive automated systems or applications (see the clause at 2452.239-70), the provision shall be used with its Alternate II.
Subpart 2415.3 --Source Selection
(a) In accordance with FAR 15.303, the source selection authorities are designated as follows:
(1) The Contracting Officer, for contracts awarded using the “lowest-priced technically-acceptable proposal” process; and,
(2) The Assistant Secretary or equivalent for the office initiating the procurement for contracts awarded using the tradeoff process. The Assistant Secretary or equivalent may delegate this function to appropriate departmental personnel.
(3) For procurements for the performance of legal services by outside counsel, using either the "lowest-price technically acceptable" or "tradeoff" approach, the General Counsel or his/her designee.
(b) The technical requirements related to source selection shall be performed by a Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). Generally, a TEP will consist of three to five members, with one member serving as the chairperson. For procurements involving technical complexity, the TEP may include advisors and committees to focus on specific technical areas or concerns. For relatively low dollar value and routine acquisitions of equipment, supplies or services, the TEP may consist of one technical representative. The TEP is responsible for documenting the evaluation of all proposals as appropriate to the source selection approach in use and for making the source selection recommendation to the source selection authority.
(d)(1) The solicitation shall state the basis for the source selection decision as either “lowest-priced technically-acceptable” process (LPTA) or “trade-off process” (as defined at FAR Subpart 15.1).
(a) After receipt of proposals, the Contracting Officer will forward copies of the technical portion of each proposal to the TEP Chairperson or his or her designee. The cost/price portion of each proposal shall be retained by the Contracting Officer pending initial technical evaluation by the TEP.
(3) Technical evaluation. The TEP shall rate each proposal based on the evaluation factors specified in the solicitation. The TEP shall identify each proposal as being either acceptable, unacceptable but capable of being made acceptable, or unacceptable. A proposal shall be considered unacceptable if it is so clearly deficient that it cannot be corrected through written or oral discussions. Under the trade-off process, predetermined cut-off scores designed to determine a threshold level of acceptability of proposals shall not be employed. A technical evaluation report, which complies with FAR 15.305(a)(3), shall be prepared and signed by the technical evaluator(s), furnished to the contracting officer, and maintained as a permanent record in the official procurement file.
2415.308 Source selection decision.
After receipt and evaluation of final proposal revisions, the TEP shall document its selection recommendation(s) in a final written report. The final report shall include sufficient information to support the recommendation(s) made, appropriate to the source selection approach and type and complexity of the acquisition.
Subpart 2415.5 - Preaward, Award and Postaward Notifications, Protests and Mistakes
2415.507 Protests against award.
Protests against awards of negotiated procurements shall be processed in accordance with FAR Subpart 33.1 and HUDAR Subpart 2433.1.
Subpart 2415.6 --Unsolicited Proposals
2415.605 Content of unsolicited proposals.
2415.605-70 Unsolicited research proposals.
FAR Subpart 15.6 outlines the policies and procedures relating to unsolicited proposals. In addition to these requirements, the Department requires that each award made as the result of an unsolicited proposal for research contain a commitment to provide actual cost-sharing. This provision will be included in the award whether or not cost-sharing was part of the unsolicited proposal.
(a) The contact points shall ensure that unsolicited proposals are controlled, evaluated, safeguarded and disposed of in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.6. Proposals, as used in this section shall mean proposals for procurement contracts with the Department and shall not include proposals or applications for assistance, including grants or cooperative agreements.
(b) Unless otherwise specified in a Federal Register announcement, unsolicited proposals should be submitted to --
(1) For research: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, PD&R Correspondence Unit, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-0001.
(2) For all others: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-0001.