PART 8--REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBPART 8.4 – FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES
8.405-6 Limited sources justification and approval.
SUBPART 208.70 -- COORDINATED ACQUISITIONS
208.7004 Procedures.
208.7005 Military interdepartmental purchase requests (MIPRs).
SUBPART 8.8 -- ACQUISITION OF PRINTING AND RELATED SUPPLIES
8.802 Policy
PART 8 -- REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
SUBPART 8.4 – FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES
8.405 – ORDERING PROCEDURES FOR FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES.
8.405-6 Limited sources justification and approval.
(d)(2) As a minimum, each justification shall include the following information:
(S-90) Whether or not a written Acquisition Plan (AP) is required, and if so, attach a copy of the approved AP to the limited sources justification and approval.
(S-91) Refer to DISA Contracting and Acquisition Templates, Samples, and Guides, J&A Templates, located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/DitcoContractingTemplates/doku.php?id=j_a_templates for the J&A template for FAR/DFARS/PGI Parts 8 acquisitions.
(S-92) See DARS 6.303-90(c) and (d) and 6.304(S-90) for requirements for modified justifications.
(S-93) For brand name orders against the FSS program, the documentation or justification required by FAR 8.405-6 shall to be posted with the Request For Quotation (RFQ) to (http://www.ebuy.gsa.gov ).
SUBPART 208.70 -- COORDINATED ACQUISITIONS
208.7004 Procedures.
PLD will route MIPRs to CFE8 within 3 business days for acceptance.
208.7005 Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (MIPRs)
(S-90) MIPRs (DD Form 448/448-2) coded "MC" used to transfer funds within DITCO-NCR , coded “MZ” used to transfer funds within DITCO-Scott, and “MR” for outgoing transfer of funds between Federal Agencies (e.g., Air Force, Army, Navy, Marine Corp).
● DARS Part 17.5 (Interagency Acquisitions Under the Economy Act) does not apply to MIPRs coded "MZ."
(S-91) MIPRs (DD Form 448/488-2) used in accordance with DFARS Subpart 208.7004/7005 are coded "MR."
● The Economy Act may apply to MIPRs coded "MR" and Reimbursable Agreement/Order for Services between Federal Agencies (ROs) (DISA Form 125). See DARS Subpart 17.500(b)(S-93) and Considerations for Determining Economy Act Applicability, located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/DitcoContractingTemplates/doku.php?id=economy_act for applicability. Points of contact: Agency Competition Advocate for D&Fs for Economy Act orders for support agreements.
(S-92) If acquiring Information Technology (IT) including National Security System (NSS) IT, Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks and Information Integration) (ASD(NII)) reporting requirements apply if the requirement meets or exceeds the thresholds at DARS Subsection 39.101(S-93). Points of contact: Information Management Officer/Information Management Representative and/or Information Systems Security Manager/Information Systems Security Officer.
(S-93) DISA's versions of the DD Form 448 and DD Form 448-2 are available at DISANet, Standard Applications, FORMS, Other Forms, LD 448 & LD 448-2.
(S-94) The requirements office is responsible for originating MIPRs/ROs and ensuring all required documents are completed and approved (e.g., D&F for Economy Act orders, support agreement, etc.) before submission to resource managers for funding cites. Attach all required documents to MIPRs/ROs (unless previously provided) and include mailing/handling instructions for the office of execution (e.g., indicate which documents need to be mailed with the MIPR/RO).
(S-95) The requirements office shall process all MIPRs/ROs.
(S-96) When support agreements are required, include the DISA support agreement number on the MIPR/RO.
(S-97) Resource managers must ensure support agreement numbers are cited (when applicable) before sending to the office of execution for certification.
(S-98) The office of execution shall not execute MIPRs/ROs without copies of all required documents/approvals. When D&Fs/support agreements are required, a copy shall be sent to the servicing agency as an attachment to the MIPR/RO in accordance with DARS 17.504-90 unless the servicing agency previously received copies.
SUBPART 8.8 — ACQUISITION OF PRINTING AND RELATED SUPPLIES
(b) DISA’s central printing authority is Personnel and Manpower (DISA MPS)), who serves as a liaison with the Congressional Joint Committee on Printing (JCP) and the Public Printer on matters relating to printing. The KO in conjunction with the requirements office shall obtain approval from DISA MPS before issuing a solicitation or contract action for printing services or related supplies. DISA MPS determines whether the job will be done by DISA or contracted out.
(S-90) Contractor printing and duplication is limited to the minimum number of copies needed to review each contract deliverable, as specified in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). The Government does not reimburse the contractor for copies in excess of the quantities specified in a CDRL. Deliverable quantities shall only be the minimum needed by the Government to review, reject, or accept the product. Contractor printing and duplication must comply with the referenced legislation, statute, and the Government Printing and Binding Regulations, published by the JCP.
(S-91) To ensure compliance with these restrictions, requiring offices are responsible for including these printing and duplication limits in the statements of work for new acquisitions, as well as existing contracts. Modifications to existing contracts are subject to the “Changes” clause of the contract.
(S-92) The following are exceptions to this policy:
(1) Classes of work considered urgent or necessary by the JCP;
(2) Printing in field printing plants operated by Executive Departments;
(3) Individual printing orders costing not more than $1,000 if the work is not of a continuous or repetitious nature and certified by the Public Printer, Government Printing Office;
(4) Printing for various intelligence agencies; and
(5) Printing from other sources specifically authorized by Section 207, Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1993, Pub.L. No. 102-392, 106 Stat 1703, 1719-20 (Oct. 8, 1992).